"
Wireless hijacking under scrutiny
A recent court case, which saw a West London man fined £500 and sentenced to 12 months' conditional discharge for hijacking a wireless broadband connection, has repercussions for almost every user of wi-fi networks.
It is believed to be the first case of its kind in the UK, but with an estimated one million wi-fi users around the country, it is unlikely to be the last."
Interesting case. "
Gaining unauthorised access to a computer is an offence covered by the Computer Misuse Act" is states - but if you're using just their connection to the internet, are you actully gaining access to their computer. Well, no, you're not, are you?
"
...the person installing the network, be they a home user or a business, has ultimate responsibility for any criminal activity that takes place on that network." Well that is more clear-cut. That translates to "if you don't secure your network, and someone uses it illegally, its your fault". So anyone out there running a wireless network, broadcasting the SSID and without any encryption, it asking for trouble.
On the other hand, if it comes to court, how do actually prove that your network was secure
at the time of the offense? There is no log of settings (that I've ever seen) and you could simply change the settings on the router after the event - noone would know.
If this law were carried over to car theft, if your car was stolen and used in a crime, you would be liable. Fortunately that's not the case. Yet.
BBC NEWS | Technology | Wireless hijacking under scrutiny